User talk:Neoclassicism Enthusiast

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Neoclassicism Enthusiast!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:42, 6 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Coffeepot MET DP103144 (cropped).jpg[edit]

File:Coffeepot MET DP103144 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 10:00, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Septembrie 2020: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România![edit]

Deși trecem prin momente dificile în aceste vremuri imprevizibile generate de pandemia de COVID-19, competiția Wiki Loves Monuments are loc și anul acesta, implicit și în România.

Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Întrucât o carantină nu este programată în România, puteți să ieșiți în continuare să faceți fotografii - luând toate măsurile de siguranță recomandate de autoritățile locale de sănătate. Dacă preferați să evitați ieșirile, cu siguranță aveți fotografii cu monumente înregistrate pe calculator din ultima călătorie! Aceasta este o oportunitate excelentă de a le oferi o a doua viață prin concursului Wiki Loves Monuments. Pe lângă faptul că vor fi vizibile pentru toată lumea, fotografiile dumneavoastră ar putea reprezenta România în competiția internațională. De asemenea ele pot apărea în diverse articole la Wikipedia și pot contribui la conservarea online a patrimoniului cultural și istoric al României.

Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.

Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes vă dorim și să vă bucurați, în condiții de siguranță, de patrimoniul care vă înconjoară!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Warning[edit]

Hi Neoclassicism Enthusiast. I noticed that you've made malformed deletion requests. When you want to delete a page with the {{Delete}} template, you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion. Alternatively, you can click the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, under the "tools" section, which does all of the work for you. Please do one of these, otherwise you create a lot of work for other people. If you don't see the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, you can use the JavaScript method of enabling AjaxQuickDelete on Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets once and then refresh once. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 12:25, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok--Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 18:42, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So what happened here? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 14:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And here? That is the same file. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 13:37, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Piața Romană[edit]

Does anyone call Piața Romană "Roman Square"? I've literally never heard that anywhere. Yes, it's a more or less accurate translation (not sure I'd pick "Square" over the cognate "Plaza", but whatever) but still... - Jmabel ! talk 22:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Non-existent category[edit]

Looks like https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cercul_Militar_Nat_2.jpg&curid=1035188&diff=557394412&oldid=487078418 changed Category:Columns in Romania to a nonexistent Category:Corinthian columns in Bucharest. Feel free to revert, make appropriate categories, whatever you prefer, but at the moment the effect is that this is no longer anywhere under Category:Columns in Romania, which is clearly wrong. Jmabel ! talk 03:16, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was editing the categories of certain files, and here I wanted to write Category:Corinthian columns in Romania.--Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 03:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bookshelf in a house from Bucharest (Romania).jpg[edit]

File:Bookshelf in a house from Bucharest (Romania).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:47, Bulevardul Regina Elisabeta, Bucharest (Romania).jpg

And also:

File:Detail of the Bucharest City Hall.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Acknowledgment[edit]

Salut. Vă scriu această notă ca să vă mulțumesc pentru contribuțiile dvs remarcabile pe acest proiect. Dahn (talk) 10:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cu plăcere ^_^ Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 10:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:39, Strada Știrbei Vodă, Bucharest (Romania).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Navigation Palace in Galați.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyrighted public works and art of Romania[edit]

Hello. Please take note that Romania does not allow commercial freedom of panorama. On Wikimedia Commons, according to COM:Licensing#Forbidden licenses it is not allowed to host content here in which commercial reuses are prohibited. This also extends to works seen in public spaces, like hundreds of buildings from Romania. Please do not upload your photos showing buildings or monuments made by architects or sculptors who are not yet dead for more than 70 years. Also, do not import photos of such works from Romanian Wikipedia. Romanian Wikipedia seems to allow unfree artworks, thus unfree architectural works must stay there for a long time.

Only a change in Romanian copyright law to remove non-commercial restriction will finally allow such public works and art from Romania to be hosted on Commons. If not, wait for the 70th anniversary of architect or sculptor's death, unfortunately. Regards, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:35, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2K, Splaiul Independenței, Bucharest (Romania).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Interior of the Bucharest City Hall (01).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:12, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality image nominations[edit]

Hellow, i saw that today you have nominated more than 20 images for quality images, however you can nominate only 5 per day, so I declined the 19 last because of this rule. You can nominate 5 of them tomorrow, 5 more the day after tomorrow etc. Also, don't forget to sign using ~~~~. C messier (talk) 20:42, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 8A, Bulevardul Aviatorilor , Bucharest (Romania).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 16:38, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality, but please, sign your nominations --Poco a poco 16:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pair of Spindle Vases - OA 11090 - Louvre (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks dude! Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 11:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 Piața Sfântul Ștefan, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21 Calea Griviței, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29 Calea Victoriei, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Harsh contrasts, but still QI --MB-one 15:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salon ovale de la princesse in the Hôtel de Soubise (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --C messier 20:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 Strada Termopile, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --C messier 19:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 Intrarea Spătarului, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --C messier 21:54, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9 Bulevardul Banu Manta, Bucharest (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --C messier 18:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9 Bulevardul Banu Manta, Bucharest (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --C messier 18:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 109 Calea Victoriei, Bucharest (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Cayambe 21:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:18 Calea Dorobanților, Bucharest (30).jpg[edit]

File:18 Calea Dorobanților, Bucharest (30).jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

COM:CSD#G7, own work within a week per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:18_Calea_Doroban%C8%9Bilor,_Bucharest_(30).jpg&diff=prev&oldid=737066688.

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.

If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 13:35, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15 Strada Ienăchiță Văcărescu, Bucharest (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment can you crop out the car on the very bottom? It's distracting. Otherwise ok.--MB-one 11:38, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done Now good quality. --MB-one 16:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9 Strada Dumbrava Roșie, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 Strada Dumbrava Roșie, Bucharest (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! @Neoclassicism Enthusiast: I checked several your images and found that many of them today and previous days were added to QI review page without File: prefix. Please, consider checking the method you use to add QI candidates. I have corrected the issue there I noticed it. Thank you and good luck! -- LexKurochkin (talk) 07:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
P. S. I also noticed, that on several your architecture images the upper side of a subject is slightly out of focus. So, as a friendly suggestion, consider checking upper elements of architecture image while processing them. Good luck! -- LexKurochkin (talk) 07:20, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanx dude! Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 17:15, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 Strada Dumbrava Roșie, Bucharest (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --痛 03:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1-5 Strada Polonă, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 Strada Dumbrava Roșie, Bucharest (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 Bulevardul Dacia, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 Bulevardul Dacia, Bucharest (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:51, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1-7 Strada Gheorghe Polizu, Bucharest (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26 Bulevardul Regina Elisabeta, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:29, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you for basically creating a database of the awesome buildings in Bucharest! Awesome for anyone interested to see and learn! All names i want are taken (talk) 17:02, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanx dude! Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 04:42, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3 Strada Doctor Paleologu, Bucharest (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, interesting image --PantheraLeo1359531 15:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 22 Calea Victoriei, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Perspective seems intentional (and having been there, I can understand why it was taken like this). Overall, good quality. --BigDom 15:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 36-40 Calea Dorobanților, Bucharest (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:59, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 32 Calea Dorobanților, Bucharest (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:00, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 48 Calea Dorobanților, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 41 Strada General H. M. Berthelot, Bucharest (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 41 Strada General H. M. Berthelot, Bucharest (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 41 Strada General H. M. Berthelot, Bucharest (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 41 Strada General H. M. Berthelot, Bucharest (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 69 Calea Dorobanților, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 58 Calea Dorobanților, Bucharest (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 54 Calea Dorobanților, Bucharest (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of the Ciobanu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of the Alexandru de Linche de Moissac Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:21, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9 Strada Dumbrava Roșie, Bucharest (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of the Hornoff-Tomoroga Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 08:23, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of the Generals Gheorghe C. Praporgescu and Doctor Mircea D. Herescu Families in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 08:23, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of Ella Gr. Cara-Costea in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:14, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of Ella Gr. Cara-Costea in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --Famberhorst 05:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of Ella Gr. Cara-Costea in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:14, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave in the Bellu Cemetery, unknown owner (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:14, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of Mihail Anchelovici and Ecaterina Anchelovici in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:14, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 48 Calea Dorobanților, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 15:36, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16 Strada Dimitrie Racoviță, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Chainwit. 10:41, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of the Costin Petrescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 Strada Principatele Unite, Bucharest (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Florstein 06:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Planter in the Bellu Cemetery, Bucharest (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:27, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Planter in the Bellu Cemetery, Bucharest (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:27, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of the Manicatide Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think it was better before brightening. But weak Support for me. -- Spurzem 15:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave in the Bellu Cemetery, unknown owner (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Well composed. Resolution and detail are borderline, but O.K.. --Augustgeyler 19:15, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of the Păunescu and Rotaru Families in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support The presence of the garbage can is very regrettable, but I consider the quality sufficient. -- Ikan Kekek 23:06, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Planter in the Bellu Cemetery, Bucharest (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Planter in the Bellu Cemetery, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of Toma Stelian in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 Strada Clopotarii Vechi, Bucharest (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:49, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave in the Bellu Cemetery, unknown owner (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Planter in the Bellu Cemetery, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of the Visarion Alexa Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Could be more detailed and better contrasted. But I think it is QI. --Augustgeyler 18:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of the D. Bungetzianu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good light and well composed. Level of detail is within the limits. --Augustgeyler 18:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of the Visarion Alexa Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:07, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46 Bulevardul Lascăr Catargiu, Bucharest (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46 Bulevardul Lascăr Catargiu, Bucharest (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 Strada Radu Calomfirescu, Bucharest (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12 Bulevardul Lascăr Catargiu, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave in the Bellu Cemetery, unknown owner (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Window of the Pavillon Frais (Trianon).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:35, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1C Bulevardul Corneliu Coposu, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46 Bulevardul Lascăr Catargiu, Bucharest (46).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46 Bulevardul Lascăr Catargiu, Bucharest (47).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 Strada Radu Calomfirescu, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 12:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 7 Bulevardul Hristo Botev, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 39 Bulevardul Dacia, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 Piața Romană, Bucharest (57).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Ok, for a QI --Jakubhal 04:33, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 25 Bulevardul Bucureștii Noi, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 133 Calea Călărașilor, Bucharest (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 08:31, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interior of the Aile des ministres sud (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3 Piața Romană, Bucharest (41).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 06:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 8 Piața Romană, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 06:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9 Piața Romană, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 18:09, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 Strada Rabat, Bucharest (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:36, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 Strada Rabat, Bucharest (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:37, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Adăugare CC[edit]

Bună! Nu sunt sigur de ce ați adăugat licența Creative Commons la un fișier care fusese publicat în domeniu public? Gikü (talk) 13:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

L-am transferat de pe Wikipedia pe Commons și era nevoie să adaug o licență sau modul în care poate să fie folosit. Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 14:32, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 50B Bulevardul Bucureștii Noi, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Gursky would be interested --Grunpfnul 17:53, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 Șoseaua Pavel D. Kiseleff, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:16, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 Strada Arthur Verona, Bucharest (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality --Llez 05:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 Bulevardul Regina Elisabeta, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality --Llez 05:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 25 Bulevardul Bucureștii Noi, Bucharest (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 Strada Logofătul Udriște, Bucharest (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 Strada Logofătul Udriște, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 Șoseaua Pavel D. Kiseleff, Bucharest (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 Strada Arthur Verona, Bucharest (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 Șoseaua Pavel D. Kiseleff, Bucharest (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Красный 06:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 Șoseaua Pavel D. Kiseleff, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Красный 06:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 Strada Rabat, Bucharest (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 Strada Logofătul Udriște, Bucharest (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 Strada C.F. Robescu, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Stepro 07:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 Strada Arthur Verona, Bucharest (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 16:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 Strada Logofătul Udriște, Bucharest (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. I would consider shooting raw, since the Apple Photo app tends to overprocess the images. --MB-one 10:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diffuser Mandarin vase, by HELLE MARDAHL, glass, at sale at The Edit shop (Strada Icoanei no. 20), Bucharest, Romania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunny vinyl figure which portrays a dragon embroidered on a silk brocade door valance and side panels (Chinese, 17th-18th century) in The MET collection.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 Strada C.F. Robescu, Bucharest (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 16:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 Strada Iuliu Valaori, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:44, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 Strada C. A. Rosetti, Bucharest (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 15:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Street art painting on Strada Arthur Verona in Bucharest, Romania.jpg[edit]

File:Street art painting on Strada Arthur Verona in Bucharest, Romania.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polychrome Rococo Revival frame, circa 1900, painted metal (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street sign of Strada Stănileși in Bucharest, Romania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 13:08, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 69 Calea Călărașilor, Bucharest (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Moroder 13:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 Strada Iuliu Valaori, Bucharest (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --SHB2000 07:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 8 Strada Zossima Demarat, Bucharest (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 36 Strada Maria Rosetti, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 18:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 Piața G.C. Cantacuzino, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 12:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 77 Calea Călărașilor, Bucharest (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:49, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26 Strada Viitorului, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Mayfair Rose 21:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16A Bulevardul Nicolae Bălcescu, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Mayfair Rose 21:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 8 Strada Zossima Demarat, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 28 Strada Thomas Masaryk, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --SHB2000 04:48, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12 Strada Pitar Moș, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --SHB2000 04:48, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 77 Calea Călărașilor, Bucharest (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 21:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 33 Strada Gramont, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 07:33, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 92 Strada Vasile Lascăr, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Stifone 08:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 45 Strada Vasile Lascăr, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 19:07, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 22 Strada Doctor Petre Herescu, Bucharest (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:44, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 76 Strada Vasile Lascăr, Bucharest (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --多多123 12:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 76 Strada Vasile Lascăr, Bucharest (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --多多123 12:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18 Strada Grigore Cobălcescu, Bucharest (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:14, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18 Strada Grigore Cobălcescu, Bucharest (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --多多123 18:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18 Strada Grigore Cobălcescu, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of the G. Ghinea Dumitrescu Family in the Bellu Cemetery in Bucharest, Romania (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 76 Strada Vasile Lascăr, Bucharest (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 05:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Strada Maramureș, Bucharest (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Красный 08:24, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29 Strada Berzei, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Красный 08:24, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56 Strada Grigore Cobălcescu, Bucharest (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:09, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18 Strada Grigore Cobălcescu, Bucharest (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support The level of detail is quite low in the higher part, but I think it is good enough for QI --Jakubhal 06:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14 Strada Grigore Cobălcescu, Bucharest (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Almost too strong contrasts, but still ok. --MB-one 18:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 36 Rue de Monceau, Paris (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:01, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magazine of the holy synod, an example of Romanian Revival graphic design, from March 1927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 11:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 Rue Eugène-Manuel, Paris (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bust of Smaranda Gheorghiu, by Mihai Onofrei, in the Cișmigiu Park in Bucharest, Romania.jpg[edit]

File:Bust of Smaranda Gheorghiu, by Mihai Onofrei, in the Cișmigiu Park in Bucharest, Romania.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality[edit]

Thank you for proposing some images I took for quality promotion. I appreciated :) --Sailko (talk) 08:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You’re welcome. Glad to hear that! Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 09:46, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Titan Park[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Titan_Park&diff=804960619&oldid=666095876: I realize pretty much everyone calls it "Parcul Titan", but isn't the name I gave the official one? - Jmabel ! talk 14:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

From what I know, and according to Google Maps, there are two parks which have a common side, the Liviu Rebreanu Street. The one above the street is Alexandru Ioan Cuza, and the one under is Titan Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 14:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Could well be officially two parks. I've spent less than a year of my life in Bucharest, and none of that in the last decade or so, plus that's certainly not the part of town I know best. Still, not sure I'd totally trust Google maps on thing like official vs. informal names. If you Google "parc titan bucuresti site:.gov.ro" (without the quotation marks) you'll turn up quite a few places where the city government uses the "IOR" name, and a few with things like "Titan-IOR" or "IOR/Titan". Probably the "IOR" name deserves at least a mention. - Jmabel ! talk 17:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:1, Bulevardul Hristo Botev, Bucharest (Romania).jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wrong license?[edit]

This image: File:Drawing of the Ziggurat of Ur, Iraq, by Marjorie V. Duffell for C. L. Woolley, 1937.jpg seems to be licensed wrong. I don't think this is your work? But that's the license. What is the correct license? If it is under copyright, we can't use it here. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 04:08, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]